Reserve the date!!
The next plenary meeting of IVTIP will be held on:
October 26-27, 2006, Hamburg, Germany
The meeting will be hosted by IVTIP member company Beiersdorf AG. The meeting will start October 26 at 10.00 h and end October 27 at 15.00 h. Central themes will be 'Risk Assessment in the cosmetics and chemical industries' , 'reproductive toxicity testing' and an overview of present-day skin models.
In due course, IVTIP members will receive details about the location/accommodation and the agenda.
The Parliament has, in its first reading on FP7 on 15 June 2006, overwhelmingly backed the Commission views on the future of European research. It followed the line of its Industry committee and agreed that embryonic stem cell research may continue to be financed under the current case-by-case approach used in FP6.
MEPs want to split one of the nine thematic research areas proposed by the Commission, security and space, into two separate headings. FP7's Co-operation programme would thus consist of 10 themes. MEPs highlight health and energy as their major priorities among the thematic research areas.
MEPs wish to earmark at least 15% of the Co-operation programme to SMEs, this quota is currently effective in FP6, but was not proposed by the Commission for FP7. In addition, instead of one evaluation of FP7 in 2010, two interim assessment, in 2009 and in 2011, are needed. The Parliament also passed an amendment to bring the budget of FP7 in line with the Financial Perspective agreement: 50.521 billion euro for 2007-2013.
As to the European Research Council (ERC), the Parliament backs its establishment as an executive agency, which, after a transition period, should become an independent structure.
The Parliament is set to hold its second reading on FP7 right after the summer holidays, in autumn 2006. In the meanwhile, the issue will be at the Council's table. First calls for proposals for FP7 projects could be published earliest in December 2006, for submission in March 2007, and, after an evaluation period, the first FP7 project could be kicked off at the end of 2007 or early 2008.
Further reading:
Source: EurActiv News, June 15, 2006
Following Parliament's amendments and Council's views on the initial proposal, the Commission has tabled a revised proposal for the EU's future research 2007-2013 (FP7). The revamped proposal is said to "take up in spirit and content, if not necessarily always with the exact wording, to a large proportion the position taken by the other institutions".
The unofficial version of the document shows no major content-related changes, but a number of clarifications and additions in many parts, especially in the different individual research themes.
Along with supporting SMEs, regions, research infrastructures and linkages between science and society, the revised proposal now has a new chapter, Support to the coherent development of research policies. It states as its objectives "enhancing the effectiveness and coherence of national and Community research policies and their articulation with other policies, improving the impact of public research and its links with industry, and strengthening public support and its leverage effect on investment by private actors".
Other modifications and clarifications touch upon, for example, the criteria used to identify potential Joint Technology Initiatives, the European Research Council's staffing arrangements and role of its scientific council. Furthermore, the much debated ethical principles, including funding for embryonic stem cell research, are now explained in far greater detail (Article 6) than in the initial proposal.
Concerning the Parliament's amendment to separate the Space & Security into two individual themes, the Commission's preliminary version on the revised FP7 still keeps them together in one theme.
The budget remains that of the revised package for EU programmes in 2007-2013 adopted on 24 May 2006 - 54.58 billion euro.
Latest & next steps:
Source: EurActiv News, June 29, 2006
The EU research ministers, gathering in an extraordinary meeting on 24 July 2006, reached a political agreement on FP7. The agreement was reached by a small majority, as the Austrian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish and Slovakian delegations voted against.
The council debate focused on funding research activities involving human embryonic stem cells, which a German-lead coalition tried to exclude from the agreement. After assurances that no funding will be granted to research activities which destroy human embryos or are aimed at procurement of stem cells, Germany and some others changed their position, making an agreement possible.
The funding for embryonic stem cell research, therefore, continues under the current case-by-case practice, forbidding research into human cloning and research that would result in hereditable changes. No activity will be funded that is forbidden in all member states and research projects will only be considered for funding from member states where the research is legal.
Further reading:
Source: EurActiv News, July 24, 2006
The European Parliament recently adopted the Commission's proposal for the EU's Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP), the first of its kind, which will cover the period from 2007 to 2013.
The CIP was designed to group all Community actions meant to support innovation and competitiveness, and is considered one of the main tools for the achievement of the Lisbon objectives. It contains three basic programmes, mainly the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme, focused on Small and Medium Enterprises; the ICT Policy Support Programme, meant to enhance the use of information and communication technologies; and the Intelligent Energy - Europe Programme to support sustainable development.
This is the first time in the EU's history that the Parliament has adopted a framework programme after the first reading.
Source: IPR HelpDesk June 6, 2006
In view of the EU's life sciences and biotech strategy mid-term policy review, the industry, EU institutions, and member states came together around a biotech policy round table on June 20, 2006 to discuss the progress made, the changes needed and new policies required to guide Europe towards bio-economy. Bio-based economy stands for a vision of a society, which is not dependent on fossil fuels for energy and industrial raw materials, but uses bio-fuels made directly from plant/crop-based renewable sources.
In the event, the Commission presented the preliminary results of a study, currently being drafted by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), on the consequences, opportunities and challenges of modern biotechnology for Europe.
The joint industry, Austrian and Finnish Presidencies' press release on the event states that the implementation of the EU life sciences and biotechnology strategy, adopted in 2002, is advancing, but that EU biotech companies still have difficulties in raising risk capital to finance R&D, the development of the regulatory system varies across the member states and communicating biotech issues to citizens has proven difficult.
Further reading:
Joint Research Centre: The Biotechnology for Europe Study - Consequences, opportunities and challenges of modern biotechnology for Europe [Background]
The European bio-based economy website (a joint industry and science initiative)
Source: EurActiv News, June 20, 2006
The Austrian EU Presidency organised a major conference on European Technology Platforms (ETPs) in Vienna on 4-5 May 2006. The event brought together, for the first time, the stakeholders of all different 29 platforms, aiming to promote cross-platform exchanges of experience and networking in complementary research and technology areas.
"Over the last three years, ETPs have become a powerful and rallying force for reaching Europe's goal of becoming a dynamic knowledge-based economy. They are now recognised at the highest political level as a key component of the renewed Lisbon strategy for transforming knowledge into growth," said Science and Research Commissioner Janez Potoãnik.
This recognition is due, according to Potoãnik, to the fact that the ETPs really unite all relevant stakeholders around common objectives, they are industry-lead ensuring focus on potential future markets and they help overcome fragmentation of European research efforts.
For the continued success of ETPs, Commissioner Potoãnik highlighted the need for the platforms to remain open to all stakeholders and transparent in their activities. These factors being even more crucial now that the Strategic Research Agendas begin to be implemented. "Closed shops of narrow groupings must be avoided at all cost," said Potoãnik.
Secondly, the Commissioner underlined the importance of avoiding undue proliferation of ETPs. "Platforms are intended to focus on key areas for European competitiveness. This means that there should not be an infinite number," he explained.
Most of the current 29 platforms have, by now, defined their objectives and drafted a Strategic Research Agenda. They are thus moving into the implementation, operational phase and setting up research and development activities, mobilising funds and exploring the potential for a Joint Technology Initiative.
European Technology Platforms can, indeed, evolve into a Joint Technology Initiative (JTI), which is a long-term public-private partnership at European level, provided for in the Article 171 of the Treaty. The Commission's official proposal for FP7 identifies the first set of JTIs in the areas of innovative medicines, nanoelectronics, embedded computing systems, hydrogen and fuel cells, aeronautics and air traffic management and global monitoring for environment and security. Further JTIs may be identified during the implementation of FP7.
Further reading:
Source: EurActiv News May 5, 2006
The Commission and member states agree that the creation of innovation-friendly lead markets is one of the main conditions for an innovative Europe and increased competitiveness. "Technology platforms could help create dynamic market conditions whereby more demanding and novelty-seeking customers and potential higher returns on investment would act as a strong pull on private research and innovation," predicts the EU Science and Research Commissioner Janez Potoãnik. He sees these stakeholder platforms as detectors of potential market opportunities and barriers to be addressed by co-ordinated public action.
Creation of Europe-wide lead markets requires also early prospective development of standards by stakeholders, anticipative product market regulation, improved intellectual property rights regime and public procurement as the driver for the demand for innovative goods and services, listed Potoãnik. The Technology Platforms bringing together all stakeholders would be an ideal tool for discussions on these issues.
Further reading:
Source: Euractiv News, July 6 2006
The Scientific Council of the European Research Council (ERC) has published, on 28 April 2006, its outline strategy for the launch of the ERC and explained how it will support young researchers at its start-up phase. The ERC is expected to be operation right from the start of the FP7, January 2007.
Two funding streams, operating on a 'bottom up' basis across all research fields will be the core of the ERC's operations for the period of FP7, 2007-2013:
"We are releasing these strategy notes today to give a clear indication of our thinking at an early stage, enabling the research community better to prepare for the launch of the ERC," said the Chairman of the Scientific Council Professor Fotis Kafatos.
Further reading:
Source: EurActiv News, May 3 2006
In a recent communication to the Council, the European Commission outlined its plans for the creation of a European Institute of Technology (EIT). The proposal for the creation of an EIT was first made during the mid-term review of the Lisbon strategy and the Commission has already received extensive feedback from stakeholders and Member States through a consultation process.
The EIT is one of the EU actions meant to strengthen innovation in Europe. It is conceived as an autonomous organisation, directed by a Governing Board, which will identify key interdisciplinary areas and appoint and support Knowledge Communities around Europe in order to carry out research, education and innovation in these areas. Knowledge Communities will integrate members from universities, research centres and industry, in order to promote the link between research, education and innovation. These three elements compose what is known as the "knowledge triangle".
The Commission communication will add to the debate regarding the EIT, and a formal proposal for the EIT's creation is expected by the end of the year.
Source: IPR HelpDesk June 15, 2006
The European Research Council (ERC) and the European Institute of Technology (EIT) are meant to be complementary. The first will be supporting frontier research and new ground-breaking discoveries, the second applied research and transfer of knowledge to innovative market applications. In separate events, two Commissioners emphasised, on 25 April 2006, the need for the scientific freedom of these bodies.
Speaking at the London School of Economics, the Commissioner for Science and Research, Janez Potoãnik, addressed the importance of the future European Research Council (ERC), giving his full support for its scientific freedom. "At the heart of the ERC concept is the recognition that practicing researchers are best placed to identify those exciting new opportunities and directions at the forefront of knowledge that will lead into the industries, markets, and broader social innovations of the future," said Potoãnik.
The Commissioner sees that the EU as a whole has problems in supporting new, emerging research fields, such as biotechnology or nanosciences, in managing their growth and assuring high research quality. "These problems suggest a mismatch between the institutional set-up for research in most European countries and the requirements of new leading sciences. Existing research funding mechanisms tend to support more established disciplines where the division between basic and applied research is more pronounced," he continued.
Addressing the European Parliament's Culture and Education Committee, the Commissioner for Education, Culture and Languages, Jan Figel expressed his views on the future European Institute of Technology (EIT). "The EIT governing board will consist of independent experts free from member states and the Commission," he assured.
The MEPs members of the Culture Committee voiced concerns about the intellectual fragmentation the EIT might bring among the European universities. They also questioned the funding of the future institution, fearing that the EIT would be built with FP7 money, at the expense of the European Research Council. Acknowledging that an EIT is a good idea, some MEPs however thought that it would be better to support existing institutions of excellence.
The European universities have expressed their reluctance to the establishment of an EIT (see EurActiv 5 April 2006). The results of the stakeholder consultation on EIT were published in March 2006.
Latest & next steps:
Source: EurActiv News, April 26, 2006
Annually, 40,000 patients in Europe are on a waiting list to receive a new organ. Currently, few exchanges of organs occur between EU-25. The main European organ exchange organisations (EOEOs) recommend development of systems for offering excess organs and the exchange of patients between countries, which raise questions such as the reimbursement of costs, common transplant list admission criteria and prevention of registration on multiple transplant lists.
An EU directive on setting quality and safety standards for human tissues and cells was adopted in 2004 and for blood and blood products in 2002.
Further reading:
Source: www.euractiiv.com
The European Commission, the European Investment Bank and the European Investment Fund have launched a new initiative called: "Joint European Resources for Micro to Medium Enterprises Initiative" (JEREMIE) that will contribute to growth and employment in line with the renewed Lisbon agenda.
JEREMIE is meant to help Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) access financing in the framework of the European Regions. This initiative will allow some of the Member States and Regions' structural funds to be transformed into special financial products to contribute to SMEs' needs as long as they fulfil certain requirements.
The initiative is expected to begin its operational phase in January 2007, with multiple objectives, including: improving business' conditions (including their funding and development), managing the scarce public resources granted under the EU programmes, coordinating and increasing efficiency of the management of public resources.
Source: IPR HelpDesk June 8, 2006
A study entitled the Factors affecting science communication concludes that, in British universities, a 'research driven' culture, the pressure to publish research, to attract funding to their departments and build career on 'hard research' are key barriers to scientists communicating their work with the public. Lack of time, due to the need to spend more of it on research was cited as an important reason for not getting engaged with science communication activities.
The survey reveals that the scientists even highlight public engagement work, such as debates, dialogues, exhibitions and media appearances, as being bad for their careers. According to the report, "some said that it was seen as being done by those who were 'not good enough' for an academic career, that it was 'light' or 'fluffy' and risked reinforcing negative stereotypes for women involved in these activities".
In recent years the Commission has intensified its efforts to communicate EU funded research activities to the general public. Thus it aims to enhance the communication between scientists and citizens in general, as citizens need to be informed about the rapid advances in science and the scientists need to understand the social context in which they operate.
Promoting a positive image of R&D in general, and attracting more young people into scientific careers in Europe, is also relevant to the Lisbon agenda, which states R&D as the key to innovation and competitiveness.
Further reading:
Source: EurActiv News, July 5, 2006
It is commonly held that the EUs efforts and attitudes towards innovation are trailing far behind the US. However, closer examination reveals that this may be a major over-generalisation. Innovation performance in some EU member states far outstrips that in most US states. Equally, sectors show wide variation. An Innovation Trend Chart policy workshop held in November 2005 looked in detail at EU-US comparisons, aiming to characterize the innovation gap more precisely and define what each can learn from the other. Below follow weak and strong points.
The US:
The EU:
For more information, see www.ppionline.org and www.technopolis-group.com
Source: European Innovation, March 2006, pp 24-25
Eurobarometer surveys on biotechnology and life sciences are being conducted every three years. In comparison to earlier surveys, the Eurobarometer 2005 survey shows that EU citizens are, in general, more optimistic about technology. However, whereas "there is widespread support for medical (red) and industrial (white) biotechnologies" there is "general opposition to agricultural (green) biotechnologies in all but a few countries," concludes the report. Europeans see genetically modified (GM) food as "not being useful, as morally unacceptable and as a risk for society".
The survey shows large support for the development of nanotechnology, pharmacogenetics and gene therapy, which most Europeans consider as "useful to society and morally acceptable". The claim that European public opinion is a constraint to technological innovation and contributes to the technological gap between the United States and Europe, is therefore, according to the report, invalid.
Comparing public opinions on both sides of the Atlantic, the report says there is a striking difference between the American and European public opinions on GM food and nanotechnologies. Europeans fiercely oppose GM food and largely support advances in nanotechnology, whereas in the US the opposite holds true.
Further reading:
Source: EurActiv News, June 21, 2006
A proposal to keep a register of chemicals selected for priority health and safety checks under REACH will create a "black list effect" that US companies fear will be used by green NGOs to force substances out of the market even before they are evaluated.
The REACH proposal defines some chemical as being "of very high concern" to human health and the environment, requesting that they be evaluated as a top priority by the future European chemicals agency in Helsinki. Substances "of very high concern" are defined as those blamed for causing cancer, genetic mutations or reproductive problems and which tend to build up in the human body and the environment [carcinogenic, mutagenic and reproductive toxic (CMR); persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT); and very persistent and very bioaccumulative (vPvB)].
However, the European chemicals agency will still be able to authorise these substances in cases where their replacement proves too difficult, too costly or when there are no alternatives. In their first reading on REACH last year, the EU Council of Ministers agreed that the agency would be able to allow the temporary use of these chemicals only under three circumstances:
In a position paper dated 10 April 2006, the American Chamber of Commerce to the EU (AmCham EU) says it is "strongly opposed" to the elaboration and publication of a so-called "candidate list" of substances of very high concern to be assessed in priority under REACH.
AmCham EU argues the mere publication of the list "will have a de facto black list effect" that is likely to cause massive business disruptions even before the agency assesses whether they can be authorised despite their high toxicity.
It says publication will make it very difficult in practice for companies making consumer products (eg, toys, food packaging and cosmetics but also others such as cars and computers) to justify the presence of 'substances of very high concern' in their products.
It expects that manufacturers will require suppliers to provide them only with raw materials that do not appear on the list, forcing them to transform complex supply chain arrangements and causing "major business disruptions and unnecessary barriers to trade".
But what AmCham EU fears the most is that the list "will be used by green NGOs and their Governmental supporters to force companies not to use these substances". Such an outcome would constitute an unnecessary obstacle to trade, opening the prospect of a WTO dispute in accordance with article 2.2 on technical barriers to trade (TBT), says AmCham EU.
On the NGO side of the fence, chemical safety campaigner Justin Wilkes at WWF's EU office prefers to turn the argument the other way round. He says making the list public would actually allow manufacturers to be informed early on about substances likely to be banned in the future, giving them more time to adapt to a changing business environment. "It is beyond doubt that there will be a list," Wilkes says. But he admits that the issue of determining whether it should be made public under REACH is still open to consideration in second reading. In any case, he warns, if the candidate list is not made freely available, the WWF and Greenpeace will publicise their own.
Latest & next steps:
Source: EurActiv News April 28, 2006
The European Commission has recently started the public consultation on their proposals to revise Directive 86/609, which regulates animal experimentation within the EU. The Commission has adopted a careful approach with the consultation, by offering two quite different versions: one for the public and the other for experts in "animal welfare, animal testing, animal science, natural sciences (especially biology, medicine, pharmacology and toxicology), legal and economic affairs related to these areas."
Although the expert consultation form is lengthy (it contains length explanations about the proposals), it is only necessary to comment on those parts which are of concern. The closing date for submission is August 18. Submissions can only be made through the web.
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/ia_info_en.htm#5
The public consultation is fairly short and concentrates on opinions about the appropriate levels of protection for laboratory animals, the acceptability of various purposes for using animals, which species should be used, transparency and alternative methods.
The results of the consultation will be made public, but the expert version of the consultation allows users to withhold their name and institution from being made public.
Source: EBRA Bulletin, June 2006
Only second generation (ie F2) captive-bred primates could be used in the future for research, although there might be a phase-in period for this change.
The 2002 figures show that 9,267 non-human primates were used in scientific procedures in the EU. Of these, 1095 were new-world primates, the vast majority of which would have been marmosets, which are routinely bred in long-term colonies and this would be at least second generation captive bred. The remaining 8075 are old world primates, nearly all of which would be macaques. The vast majority of these are imported into the EU.
The main macaque breeders are in Mauritius, Philippines. China and Israel.
The vast majority of macaques are used in the EU for the development and testing of pharmaceuticals and vaccines, although a significant minority is used in academic research in the neurosciences. Since there is little prospect of a supply of F2 animals becoming available, this proposal would cause all pharmaceutical and vaccine industry primate work and much academic primate neuroscience research to be moved out of the EU.
Source: EBRA Bulletin, June 2006
Animal rights activists have continued their campaign of intimidation after it was revealed that GlaxoSmithkline (GSK) shareholders were sent letters demanding they sell any shares held within the company. The act was carried out as part of an increasingly violent campaign against the Huntingdon Life Sciences laboratory in Cambridgeshire, which GSK are known to have close links with. According to details published in the Guardian newspaper, an anonymous animal rights group claimed to be writing to all 170,000 small investors warning them to sell up. However, it is unclear how many did receive a letter. The letter stated that animal rights activists would "hold Huntingdon Life Sciences accountable for its acts of animal cruelty" and warned that every shareholder would receive the letter in the next two weeks."
GSK issued a statement and advice instructing shareholders on action to be taken should they receive one of these letters. The statement also reassured shareholders that the police had been informed and an investigation had been started.
Source: www.DrugResearcher.com, May 9, 2006
A pioneering website has been set up that enables members of the UK public to express their support for medical research that uses animals as subjects. The move is in response to recent news reports that have portrayed animal research as an unnecessary process, which has been carried despite mass protests from the general public.
The website aims to gather the details of those that log on forming a petition that effectively gives a voice to the "silent majority" who accept the need for animal studies. The petition, which has been set up by The Coalition for Medical Progress (CMP), includes pharmaceutical companies and those involved in academic research. In signing the petition, the visitor agrees to three statements that embody why animal research experimentation is important and necessary.
The statements read: "Medical research is essential for developing safe and effective medical and veterinary treatments, requiring some studies using animals. Where there is no alternative available, medical research using animals should continue in the UK. People involved in medical research using animals have a right to work and live without fear of intimidation or attack."
The People's Petition is available at:
http://www.thepeoplespetition.org.uk/
Source: www.DrugResearcher.com, April 20, 2006
US scientists have discovered that sugar and olive oil do not just belong in the kitchen - but could potentially be used to develop naturally-derived nanomaterials for drug delivery systems and biological scaffolds.
Fundamental research from the US (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in New York ) suggests that an enzyme could convert sugars in the presence of olive oil to form organic gels called 'nano organogels'. These organic gel nanomaterials could be used to encapsulate pharmaceutical products to create new drug delivery systems, as well as being used to build 3D biocompatible scaffolds for tissue engineering and designing membranes. The science behind the gels entailed using the enzyme lipase B from Candida antarctica (CALB) to form esters of trehalose, a sugar found naturally in mushrooms, honey, lobster and shrimp. The trehalose diesters then self-assemble into 3-D fibres measuring between 10 and 50 nanometers in diameter. As the fibres entangle, a large amount of solvent gets packed together, trapping some 10,000 molecules. Disintegration of the gels could occur, said the researchers, by re-exposure to lipase, an enzyme that is naturally present in the human intestine. This research opens up the possibility that active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) could be encompassed in the trehalose nano-gels, with release dependent on re-exposure to the enzyme.
In addition to olive oil, researchers also successfully tested the trehalose esters in six other organic solvents, including acetonitrile, acetone, isopropanol, and ethyl acetate. The scientists found that longer ester-chain trehalose derivatives could form gels in olive oil with relatively low minimum gelation concentrations. The researchers did try other sugars, including sucrose, maltose and lactose, but gels were only formed in the presence of trehalose. The findings are currently available online in advance of print publication July 17 by the journal Angewandte Chemie.
Source; In-pharmatechnologist.com, July 17, 2006
Researchers have developed a new nanocarrier system for the delivery of drugs. The nanocarrier system contains iron and so can be directed by a magnetic field to specific areas of the body, a technology which could prove invaluable in the treatment of diseases such as cancer.
For their drug delivery vehicle, researchers used polymer micelles, which are nanosized, water-dispersible clusters of polymeric molecules, and so are excellent nanocarriers for (photodynamic therapy (PDT) drugs, which are mostly water-insoluble. Along with the photodynamic drug, they encapsulated inside the nanocarriers iron oxide nanoparticles, which allowed them to respond to externally applied magnetic fields. Not only does the new system allow the guided and precise delivery of drugs to chosen areas of the body, a tumour for example, avoiding serious side effects, but it also enhances the cellular uptake of the PDT drugs it transfers. Although PDT is one of the most promising treatments for cancer as well as cardiovascular, dermatological and ophthalmic diseases, it has numerous side effects, including the patient's strong sensitivity to light for four to six weeks after treatment.
In the experiments, nanocarriers were shown to be efficiently taken up in vitro by cultured tumour cells in the area exposed to the magnetic field, as demonstrated by confocal microscopy. Once the magnetic field was applied, the concentration of drug inside the tumor cells in the target area increased. While the team demonstrated their method with PDT drugs, the technique would also be useful in delivering gene therapy, chemotherapy or practically any kind of pharmaceutical treatment into cells.
Preliminary studies in live animals have indicated that an applied magnetic field can effect a localized accumulation in the tumor site and the team is beginning in vivo studies on the new drug delivery method.
Source: www.DrugResearcher.com, June 27, 2006
Silver nanoparticles are emerging as one of the fastest growing product categories in the Nanotechnology industry, according to Bourne Research (http://www.bourneresearch.com). The market research firm reports that the ability to produce particles of silver at the nanoscale is allowing companies to leverage its known antimicrobial properties in ways never before imagined as an effective means of infection control.
Bourne Research reports that the medical sector was one of the first on board where end-uses have already migrated from burn dressings to surgical instruments and hand sanitizers. In addition, a recent study by a leading supplier of textiles to hospitals showed a dramatic reduction of infectious microbes in curtains embedded with silver nanoparticles. Sportswear manufacturers are also embracing its use to prevent odor in clothing. In the home, consumers can already find washing machines, refrigerators, HVAC filters, brooms and even food containers that employ silver nanoparticles to kill bacteria and limit mold growth -- and this is just the beginning.
Source:
Genetic Engineering News, April 18, 2006
www.genengnews.com/news/bnitem.aspx?name=556549
Scientists To Tackle Illness With 'silver Bullet', Medical News Today, 31 March 2006, http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=40586#
The University of Arizona is combining biology and electronics to develop a new type of mirochip. This microchip will have wiring consisting of microtubuli, hollow protein filaments that a play a role to unravel chromosomes during mitosis.
The hollow protein filaments are coated on the inside with a very thin layer of copper, allowing electrical conductivity, while the outside layer acts as an insulator. Research focuses on genetic modification of the microtubule to investigate their adhesion to metal surfaces.
So far, the scientists can already synthesize the microtubules and grow them in every possible length on every possible surface. The protein filaments measure approx 25 nanometer across and may reach a total length of 100 nanometer.
Apart from their use in microchip technology, the filaments may also be used in drug discovery and testing. Synthetic microtubule are an effective platform to test drugs that are able to destroy microotubuli in tumour cells.
Source:
UA pursues revolutionary approach, The Arizona Republic, May
3, 2006, www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/business/articles/0427biz-innovator0427.html
Researchers from the UK and The Netherlands genetically modified nematode worms (C.elegans) to have human receptors in their nerves, which they use to detect and avoid harmful chemicals in their environment. The research carried out involved breeding the worms to include somatostatin receptors. These receptors are normally activated by the somatostatin hormone that plays a key role in neural signalling. Worms were also introduced with chemokine receptor 5, which responds to a molecule called chemokine that plays an important role in the immune system.
Experiments with these modified worms involved placing somatostatin or chemokine in the pathway of the modified worms, which they moved away from when confronted. In his paper, published in the journal Biomedcentral Biology, John McCafferty, principal investigator at the Sanger Institute, said: "To survive, the worms have to taste and smell the environment around them, and they will automatically swim towards food and away from harmful chemicals. We basically hijacked that system to make them respond to human signalling molecules, and effectively they are tasting the human signalling molecules and swimming away from them."
The use of a worm represents a screening method at its most basic and provides a viable alternative to the robotics and high-speed computer technology involved in drug compound screening. Additionally, it eliminates the need for a highly specialised and expensive tissue culture lab to run an efficient screening operation.
Source: www.DrugResearcher.com, July 21, 2006
The National Institute of Health (NIH, USA) has the ambitious plan to identify the range of genetic mutations causing all types of human cancer: the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project. The project will last nine and will cost 1.35 $ billion and will be a joint initiative of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). TCGA will begin as a 3 year, 100 m$ pilot. During this pilot, the genomes of five cancer types will be studied. During the full scale project, approximately 50 cancer types will be studied.
For more information, see http://cancergenome.nih.gov
Schering, acting through its Schering Plough Research Institute (SPRI), signed a contract with Hurel to join the joint scientific collaboration of pharmaceutical firms organized by Hurel.
Under the agreement, SPRI will provide both scientific guidance as well as funding as Hurel continues its one-year R&D program aimed at validating and developing its microfluidic, human-on-a-chip cell-based assay platform technology. In July 2005, the company had already signed a similar collaborative agreement with Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C., ("J&JPRD"), making J&JPRD the first pharmaceutical company to enter the Joint Scientific Collaboration ("JSC").
At present there are no rapid preclinical tools to mimic the in vivo interplay of enzymes and transporters. What is needed is a simple flow-through assembly that must be amenable to incorporating hepatocytes and enterocytes, and should be high-throughput. Such a novel tool would provide great insights into the ADME of new molecular entities, expose the reasons for the discordance often found between the ADME characteristics of drug molecules across animal species versus humans, and thereby materially reduce the need to rely on animal studies of the metabolism of drugs intended for humans."
Source: Genetic Engineering News, July 25, 2006
HµREL Corporation is a development-stage enterprise based in Beverly Hills, California. HµREL is presently inaugurating a Joint Scientific Collaboration ("JSC"), through which a group of global pharmaceutical and consumer products firms will collectively provide scientific guidance and funding as HµREL carries out a one-year research and development program aimed at fully validating its technology and readying its first products for general, commercial release. HµREL projects its JSC laboratory activities to commence in the third quarter of 2005.
HµREL's first product&emdash;a microfluidic circuit that models real-time protein binding, metabolism, and extraction in the liver&emdash;will comprise the world's first comprehensive, in vitro test of first-pass liver bioavailability in humans or other species. Other HµREL applications slated for early development include devices customized for studying various multi-organ toxicities (e.g., liver/lung or liver/cardiac), as well as for studying the integrated mechanisms of absorption and bioavailability of orally administered compounds.
For more information, see www.hurelcorp.com
Scientists at Duke University Medical Center have demonstrated they can grow human stem cells in the laboratory by blocking an enzyme that naturally triggers stem cells to mature and differentiate into specialized cells. In their study, published on line and in the upcoming August 1, 2006, issue of the PNAS, the investigators discovered that an enzyme, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), stimulates hematopoietic stem cells to differentiate into blood or immune cells. They inhibited this enzyme in stem cell cultures and successfully increased the number of stem cells by 3.4 fold. Moreover, they demonstrated the new stem cells were capable of fully rebuilding the blood-forming and immune systems of immune-deficient mice. Unraveling the pathways that regulate self-renewal or differentiation in human stem cells can facilitate the ability to expand the growth of human stem cells for therapeutic uses."
Source: Genetic Engineering News July 27, 2006
UK company Delta was acquired by Novozymes, effective 6th July, and has changed its name to Novozymes Delta Ltd. NovoZymes Delta has as lead product Recombumin®, the world's first and only animal-free, commercially available recombinant human albumin. It is also well known for its yeast expression systems for safe and cost-effective recombinant protein production, as well as for its antibody fragment and albumin fusion technologies.
Source: http://www.deltabiotechnology.com/downloads/NovozymesDelta070706_2.pdf
Company Tripos has introduced its answer to rapid in-silico drug screening with its virtual screening software that uses a fully automatic flexible molecular docking algorithm to offer speed, accuracy and usability advantages over current methods.
The software aims to provide a solution to the problem of screening large compound libraries, which remains an expensive and time-consuming task. Computational high-throughput screening can enrich the fraction of suitable compounds in a screening collection, thereby reducing the cost of biological testing in lead discovery.
Two aspects determine the quality of a docking method: docking accuracy and screening enrichment. Docking accuracy measures the likelihood that a method will correctly identify and recognise the true binding mode of a ligand bound to a target protein. Screening enrichment measures the relative improvement in the identification of true binding ligands using a docking method versus random screening. Surflex-Dock addresses the protein ligand docking problem, demonstrating a novel approach that is faster, more accurate, and is five to ten-fold more specific than competing methods in detecting true binding ligands from non-binding ligands in computational screening applications. The docking search engine makes use of a patented technology.
Source: www.DrugResearcher.com, July 5, 2006
Using human instead of animal tissue in earlier stages of new drug testing will help to more accurately predict the safety of new treatments, especially liver toxicity - one of the most common reasons for a drug not being approved. This will help identify toxicity problems with new drugs before they are tested on humans, and thus reduce the number of new drug failures and speed up drug development. The Critical Path (C-Path) Institute, set up by the University of Arizona, and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to investigate ways of improving drug development, believes that a ten per cent increase in the speed of drug development can save $100m for every new drug.
However, traditionally it has been hard for drug firms to get hold of human tissue due to ethical issues and the challenges of patient and family consent. As a result, human tissue is said to be worth more than diamonds, being valued at $500/gram. Furthermore, research with human tissue has often been problematic due to inconsistent standardization and quality control of the samples being sourced by researchers.
UK's Pharmagene merged with US company Asterand in January 2006 to form a human tissue supply and research services company with an extended tissue supply network of over 70 sites in the US and Europe as well as a biorepository over 300,000 samples, making it the largest contract research organisation (CRO) of its kind in the world. The company offers supply services involving the processing and banking of tissue as well as research services and data generation.
Currently, the firm is working with 18 of the top 20 pharma companies.
Source: www.DrugResearcher.com, July 6, 2006
Neuropharma has developed a new treatment for Alzheimer's Disease, based on a novel mechanism of action that targets a little-known enzyme that contributes to the proliferation of the neurodegenerative disease.
NeuroPharma's lead compound, NP-12, has a new mechanism of action that may slow the neurodegenerative process by inhibiting the GSK-3 enzyme involved in the excessive phosphorilation of the tau protein and in the deposit of neurofibrillary tangles, one of the neurodegenerative lesions associated with neuronal death and correlated with the dementia severity.
"Proof of efficacy in several animal models and the toxicological and safety regulatory studies have shown that NP-12 could be a promising treatment for Alzheimer's disease with an innovative therapeutic approach," said Ana Martínez, R&D Director of Neuropharma.
Speaking at the 10th International Conference on Alzheimer's Disease (ICAD) taking place in Madrid from 15th to 20th July, NeuroPharma revealed that it had designed the Phase I clinical development (safety assessment and dose escalation) to establish the safety of the compound in humans and define the optimal dose for the Phase II and III trials.
"To date, NP-12 has been administered to more than 30 subjects. We have not observed any relevant adverse event," said Teodoro del Ser, medical director of the Company.
Source: www.DrugResearcher.com, July 17, 2006
NorayBio has licensed its biopharmaceutical platform Noraymet ADME (biopharmaceutical software for the prediction of human pharmacokinetics of new compounds derived from in vitro ADME data) to the English CRO BioDynamics. The companies will collaborate to further develop the software to refine human pharmacokinetic modelling. In addition to BioDynamics, NorayBio has licensed Noraymet ADME to the Spanish pharmaceutical company Faes Farma and the Finish CRO Novamass.
Julio Font (Managing Director,
NorayBio): BioDynamics decision to act as a strategic partner
on the enhancement of Noraymet ADME and to act as a reference
customer is an important validation of the work we have undertaken
in producing Noraymet ADME.
Stephen Lewinton (Managing Director, BioDynamics): I see this
as an exciting opportunity for BioDynamics to enhance its discovery
support services by facilitating cost effective prediction of
human pharmacokinetics. Poor ADMET properties remain a key cause
of compound failure in clinical development and we see a significant
opportunity to refine predictions by linking in vitro
and in vivo data. I was particularly impressed by the
robust scientific data that has been used to develop this software
and the attention that has been given to making it user friendly.
NorayBio is a bioinformatics company that designs, develops and implements software for bioscience, with great expertise in the development of software for biopharmaceutical research, mainly for ADMET, metabolism and pharmacokinetics studies. BioDynamics provides a wide range of metabolism, radiosynthesis and bioanalytical services to support both drug discovery and development. BioDynamics discovery services incorporate a wide range of in vitro and in vivo ADMET assay
Source: NorayBio Press Release, August 3, 2006.
More information: efernandez@noraybio.com
SME managers can now use a new tool to support innovation activities: the InnoSupport guide. With the tool they can learn, in a quick and practical way, about a wide range of innovation tools. It provides SMEs with ideas and lets them quickly choose the tools which could be useful, such as black box method, system and process analysis, SWOT analysis, brainstorming, knowledge management strategies, benchmarking and much more. There is also information on related policies, intellectual property management, the financing and marketing of innovation and links to innovation networks.
The tool is (freely) available at: www.innosupport.net
It is available as a searchable web-based tool and as a (hefty!) pdf-file. For more information, please contact the coordinator, Gerd Zimmer, at zimmer@pro-kompetenz.de
Stem cell-based research is poised to enter the next stage as a positive shift in government attitude together with encouraging public and private funding across several major healthcare markets is expected to promote this research like never before.
According to Frost and Sullivan's report: "Current Clinical Applications and Trials of Stem Cell-Based Therapies," increased R&D funding from governments and venture capital firms has only arisen after they have recognized the immense potential of stem cell applications in medical treatments.
One place that has made significant headway is the Asian continent, particularly South Korea. Despite last year's scandal, in which a South Korean cloning pioneer admitted fabricating results in key stem cell research, there is no doubt that the country has reached a stage in research that is envied throughout the world. The report warned of over-hyping this new technology, as the significant process gained cannot not hide the fact that stem cell-based therapies still remain in the pre-clinical stage.
Pharmaceutical and biotech companies are in limbo at the moment, unsure as to the potential of such a revolution in treatment. One company which has taken the plunge is US-based biotechnology company Advanced Cell Technologies (ACT). Its research is based on using human embryonic cells (hES). The company recently announced the derivation of hES cells without exposure to feeder layer or serum environment, representing a vital step towards commercially viable embryonic stem cell derived transplant therapy. Likewise, Geron Biomed is also using hES cells in its therapeutic research programs, focusing on spinal cord injury, heart disease, diabetes, osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. It is currently working on animal models in these areas to demonstrate proof of concept before looking towards clinical studies.
For pharmaceutical companies, stem cells contribute to drug discovery through their application in finding novel drug targets and through the development of new technology platforms. Therefore, pharmaceutical companies will increasingly explore the different methods in which stem cells can be used in the drug discovery phase to accelerate the discovery of novel drug molecules. A preclinical trial conducted by Cytori Therapeutics has yielded results that support therapeutic opportunities for adult stem and regenerative cells derived from fat tissue in the treatment of cardiac injury following heart attack.
The report; "Current Clinical Applications and Trials of Stem Cell-Based Therapies" (B706-52) is available now from Frost and Sullivan's website.
Source: www.DrugResearcher.com, April 24, 2006
The new ECVAM Workshop Report no. 56 with the title "The Assessment of Repeated Dose Toxicity In Vitro: A Proposed Approach." is now available.
The Workshop Report can be downloaded from the ECVAM Website. Please select inside "Publications" the section Workshop Reports.
Source: ECVAM News, July 2007
The new ECVAM Workshop Report no. 55 with the title "Three Rs Approaches in Marine Biotoxin Testing" is now available.
The Workshop Report can be downloaded from the ECVAM Website. Please select inside "Publications" the section Workshop Reports.
In the future, most of the projects funded by ECVAM will be assigned based on a restricted call for offer sent to competent organisations / institutes or companies, which have been included on a list of potential contracters. This list is being set up by the EC-JRC Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, that launched a call for expression of interest (CEI) to all institutions active in the field of animal testing.
Those organisations, institutes or companies wishing to be included on the list of service providers are invited to submit an application in accordance with the rules set out in the official notice published in the Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union on 8th of March 2006 for the purposes specified.
Access to the official notice:
Deadlines and validity of the list resulting from the call for expression of interest:
The list of potential service providers will remain valid for 3 years from the date of dispatch of this notice (24.02.2006). Interested parties may submit an application at any time during the period of validity of the list, with the exception of the last 3 months.
Contact for applications: silvia.bottini@cec.eu.int , Fax: +39-0332-789434
Please consult first the original document of the official notice.
A peer review panel was convened by NICEATM / ICCVAM on May 23, 2006, to evaluate the validation status of the in vitro 3T3 and normal human keratinocyte (NHK) neutral red uptake (NRU) basal cytotoxicity test methods. On August 3 SACATM will discuss the conclusions of this meeting, which are found in the _Peer Review Panel Report: The Use of In Vitro Basal Cytotoxicity Test Methods for Estimating Starting Doses for Acute Oral Systemic Toxicity Testing._ This report and other background / meeting information are available through links on the ICCVAM home page http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov
Information on IMI, the Innovative Medicines Initiative, can be found on: http://ec.europa.eu/research/fp6/index_en.cfm?p=1_innomed and http://cordis.europa.eu/lifescihealth/innovativemedicines.htm
Information on EPAA, the
European Partnership on Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing,
now has its own website:
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/epaa/index_en.htm.
Procter & Gamble have announced the Animal Welfare and Alternatives Awards for 2006. Closing dates for application is August 11.
Info can be found on:
http://www.pg.com/science/animal_alt.jhtml
or
http://www.pg.com/science/awa_awards_intro.jhtml
The latest edition of the
Forward Focus Newsletter is now available on the P&G website.
It details innovations in alternatives and animal welfare from
P&G. A copy may be downloaded at;
http://www.pg.com/science/PG_Q1_06.pdf
Information: www.healthtech.com/2006/cst/index.asp
Information: http://www.wessex.ac.uk/conferences/2006/toxic06/
Information: www.eurotox2006-6ctdc.org
Information: www.biomarkerssummit.com
http://biol.prospective-conf.u-nancy.fr/
Information: http://www.invitox2006.org
Information: http://bgatb.net/eatb_15th_congress.htm
Information: http://www.etes2006.org/
Information: www.cascadenet.org
Information: www.aacc.org/meetings/proteomics
Information: www.pharmaxl.net/home.html
Information: www.mci-group.com
Information: ivtip@planet.nl
Information: www.nanotechcongress.com
Information: CAAT Newsletter
Information: http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~invitrot/
Information: http://www.ict2007.org
Information: www.knt.co.jp/2007/wc6